Perspectives in terrorism essay

Los pasos de lopez analysis essay Los pasos de lopez analysis essay apply texas essay length requirements the cause and effect of haze essays like a winding sheet essays zerbinetta natalie dessay research papers my most prized possession.

In the first place, some of the key concepts at the heart of the definition of terrorism are extremely subjective and difficult to determine objectively. An Anthropology of State Terror Penn: There are very few such groups operating today.

During the cold war, most terrorism research focused on left-wing non-state groups; today, most terrorism research focuses on so-called "Islamist terrorism". An Agenda for Research, ed. Moreover, the intention to cause fear can usually be deduced from the targets, context and foreseen consequences of the violence.

In this case, the terrorism label is applied almost solely to non-state groups opposed to Western interests. However, there are also many prominent scholars who accept that, objectively, terrorism is a strategy of political violence that any actor can employ, including states, yet simply refuse to examine cases of state terrorism in their research.

That is, terrorism is defined and understood by the nature and characteristics of the act itself, rather than the nature of actor, and is conceived as a particular kind of political action directed towards certain strategic goals rather than as a broad ideology or movement.

However, the significance and consequences of the definitional debate go far beyond such narrow academic confines, important as they are to the field. Related to this, it also de-legitimises all forms of civilian-directed violence, including the direct targeting of civilians during war. That is, while non-state terrorists have killed tens of thousands and caused significant damage during the past century and a half, the acceptance that "states can be terrorists, too" [17] reveals that some individual states have been responsible for more terrorism than all non-state terrorist groups put together.

More importantly, there are political-normative imperatives for retaining "terrorism" as a central organising concept for the field. Similarly, it can be used to evaluate state practices during times of war, identifying those occasions when military actions go beyond strategic necessity to the use of force for the purpose of intimidating and demoralising civilians.

From this perspective, the main issue is not that we do not know what terrorism is or that we cannot clearly identify it; it is rather that the application of the definition is too often restricted—for whatever reason—to a narrow set of actors that most often happens to coincide with the current strategic interests of Western powers.

Furthermore, it has substantial indirect consequences for individuals and groups labelled as terrorists — who may then be legally subject to torture, rendition and internment without trial — and for the "suspect communities" they belong to.

His current research focuses on the discourses of terrorism and the development of 'critical terrorism studies'. Here I differ with some scholars in that I argue that it is often unhelpful to try and maintain civilian-military or combatant-non-combatant distinctions in conceptualising terrorism.

An initial tendency widely noted by some critics of the field is the selection bias of much terrorism research. You sociological and perspectives terrorism war on essay might agree with some creative writing y7 of their assumptions and disagree.

Lastly, as mentioned, it can be argued that there is already a consensus on these criteria among the leading terrorism scholars, as their definitions tend to incorporate all these elements. Scalawags during reconstruction era essay Scalawags during reconstruction era essay.

American Sociological Review, 47, 88— Conflict theory War and militarism primarily advance the interests of the military-industrial complex and take billions of dollars from unmet social needs. In short, these criteria provide a strict set of criteria for the evaluation of actions by any and all actors who are in conflict.

More importantly, unless these imbalances are addressed, the field is in danger of reinforcing the view that terrorism is solely a problem of non-state groups and individuals, and that states are immune from condemnation or sustained scholarly analysis.

In the same way that "races" do not exist objectively as a meaningful way of assigning identities and behavioural characteristics to individuals, but classifications of humankind do, so too "terrorism" does not exist as a kind of essential marker—even if classifications of different forms of political violence do.

Information for Readers and Authors

Typology of terrorism is the integral component of our current understanding of what terrorism is, what form it may take, and how we can prepare ourselves to facing the challenges of terrorist threats.

And yet, the broader terrorism studies field does not include statistics on state terrorism in any of its recognised databases, nor does it expend any real effort trying to understand the nature, causes, strategies and outcomes of state terrorism.

The most famous critique of the military-industrial complex from a conflict theorist is undoubtedly that of sociologist C.

War, then, indirectly contributed to these advances. Second, the targets of terrorist violence are not necessarily the victims of the violence, but rather the audiences to the violence. In other words, the authors suggest that political ideology is integrally linked to the notion of terrorism.

Why do you think the flag has so much symbolic importance in American society.

Importantly, the broad social and academic consensus, as well as the relevant legal precepts, is already in place for proscribing and de-legitimising actions that fall within the categories of illegitimate, terrorist violence outlined above.

Quoted in Martin, G. An examination of broader terrorism studies literature suggests four main approaches and practices towards the definition and conceptualisation of terrorism. It is not the case for example, that terrorism is solely the 'weapon of the weak'; it can also be true that "the stronger the state, the stronger the temptation to rule through a regime of terror".

Similarly, in the s, the Afghan Mujahidin were described as "freedom fighters"[28] before they were later reconstructed as "Islamic terrorists". A second emphasis concerns the use of symbols to marshal support for war or protest against war. Related Documents: Essay on Perspectives and Torture on the War of Terrorism Torture Essay Schutt April Van Camp ENC_Tuesday/Thursday 10/15/ The Truth behind Torture Acts of interrogation or torture towards humans has many perspectives.

PDF | Politics of Representation - Terrorism Essay follows acts of ‘terrorism’: individual, or non-state, terrorism, is generally seen as evil, while Perspectives, problems, proposals. Information for Readers and Authors Readers: No registration is required and access is free. An Argument for Terrorism.

Information for Readers and Authors

Perspectives on Terrorism is a journal of the Terrorism Research Initiative and the Center for Terrorism and Security Studies. Sociological perspectives on war and terrorism essay. 25/11/ by. Sociological perspectives on war and terrorism essay. 5 stars based on reviews Essay.

Information for Readers and Authors Readers: No registration is required and access is free. An Argument for Terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism is a journal of the Terrorism Research Initiative and the Center for Terrorism and Security Studies.

Perspectives on Terrorism(PT) seeks to provide a unique platform for established and emerging scholars to present their perspectives on the developing field of terrorism studies and scholarship.

Perspectives in terrorism essay
Rated 0/5 based on 61 review